Now, Psaki and the Justice Department are asking a federal court in Virginia, appointed by President Donald Trump, to challenge Doughty and excuse Psaki from testifying.

Psaki, who left her White House post in May and is preparing to host a new show on MSNBC, said it would be “extremely burdensome” for her to testify in the case.

“Among other things, I understand that I will need to devote several days to preparing for the deposition as well as attending the deposition itself, and this will be extremely disruptive to both my work and my family,” Saki said. There will be,” Saki said. An announcement Filed in Alexandria federal court.

Psaki has retained a high-powered attorney to represent him in the court battle, Jenny Rhee, a veteran of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

Justice Department lawyers have also weighed in on whether his impeachment would almost certainly lead to a protracted fight over executive privilege, given his role as a top adviser to President Joe Biden. because.

“If allowed to proceed, Ms. Psaki’s impeachment would inevitably place the executive and judicial branches ‘on a collision course’ through rulings on executive privilege, and the court would ‘reject the executive’s claims to autonomy and sovereignty. ‘ and ‘difficult questions of separation of powers and checks and balances’ will be immediately brought to the fore,” Justice Department lawyers said, citing a 2004 Supreme Court case. Written by Vice President Dick Cheney.

“Plaintiffs have not identified any evidence showing or even suggesting that Ms. Psaki, in her capacity as press secretary, communicated false information to any social media company. is, much less that they ‘used coercive force’ to compel the social media company to take any action.” DOJ brief say.

Under the federal court rules, Psaki is allowed to petition a Virginia-based court to dismiss or limit the subpoena because she resides in Virginia. His motion was assigned to Judge Patricia Giles, a Biden appointee.

In recent years, such motions have often been transferred to the court handling the original case, but the Justice Department said it opposes such a move this time. DOJ lawyers also noted that Psaki is no longer a defendant in the case, as she was replaced by Karine Jean-Pierre when Jean-Pierre took office in May.

“The Issuing District has not addressed arguments that Ms. Psaki could raise as a nonparty … regarding undue burden,” Justice Department attorneys wrote.

Justice Department officials have agreed to make some current and former officials available for depositions but have asked a New Orleans-based federal appeals court to block Doty’s order requiring testimony from three officials: Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, Cyber ​​Security and Infrastructure Security Agency Director Jane Easterly. and Rob Flaherty, White House director of digital strategy.

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has yet to rule on the petition.

Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmidt, who is running for the U.S. Senate, is leading the case, which is joined by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry. Former President Donald Trump filed three similar lawsuits against major social media firms last year, but was unable to obtain discovery in any of them.

Rhee, Psaki and Schmitt’s office did not respond to messages seeking comment on the controversy.

#Psaki #DOJ #Fight #Social #Media #Speech #Suit

Source link