John Bolton served as the 25th United States Ambassador to the United Nations and the 26th United States National Security Advisor from 2018 to 2019.

Britain’s ongoing political turmoil is hardly accurate, nor is it a measure of London’s long-term international standing.

All democracies experience political unrest from time to time, especially under constitutional systems where executive authority depends on a parliamentary majority. In response to contemporary doomsayers, the British can rightly say that their democracy fared much better than the rest of the continent during the 20th century.

Predicting what lies ahead for Britain requires starting with the wider international political environment. Earlier this year, the US and its NATO allies failed to stop Russia from invading Ukraine. Despite the West’s enormous efforts after February 24, the basic historical fact is their collective failure to deter Moscow’s offensive. Initially. Nuclear deterrence eventually led us to victory in the Cold War, yet the alliance seemed clueless as to how to establish deterrence against conventional att*ck.

It is perfectly reasonable to worry about government instability, but if governments cannot prevent external threats, whether stable or unstable, ultimately it means little. And the consequences of failing to deter Russia in Ukraine are small change compared to China’s failure to deter future belligerent actions in its wider Indo-Pacific region.

When we look at the international threats that now loom, it helps to put the UK’s political landscape into perspective.

Furthermore, since the Kremlin’s invasion, there is a strong, indeed compelling, case that Britain has been the largest foreign power supporting Ukraine. Backed by Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Foreign Secretary Liz Truss and Defense Secretary Ben Wallace, London was at the forefront of political commitment and leadership, and on a per capita basis – along with Poland and the Baltic republics – Kyiv’s largest military supplier. He was the giver. Help.

Of course, overall US assistance, especially including intelligence, has been overwhelming, but British political commitment and commitment have remained consistently strong. There was no talk or uncertainty about a “minor incursion” by Russia. As from US President Joe Biden In the dangerous days before the invasion, and after, there was no hesitation about what to provide Ukraine, and how much, as in Washington and European capitals.

That both Johnson and Truss fell from power without affecting Britain’s focus on Ukraine’s goals is a significant point about the underlying strength and flexibility of Britain’s position in global affairs.

More generally, there is no credible argument that any other European government is currently doing a better job in international affairs. It’s true that the British pound fell during the turmoil and uncertainty of the Truss government, but has anyone noticed that the euro is still below par against the dollar?

President Emmanuel Macron in France Had to ram His government budgets, using extraordinary constitutional provisions, because parliament will not function, and his own legislative support may crumble under the pressure. (Of course, the US federal budget process hasn’t worked for many years either.)

In Germany, Chancellor Olaf Schulz is grappling with the consequences of decades of misguided energy policy in a coalition government that often appears paralyzed. He repeatedly faced questions about whether Germany was ready to lead Europe. Or even keep Its economy is strong and its citizens are warm this winter.

Meanwhile, who knows what will happen with Italy’s new coalition government? and so on.

The real problem in Britain is the reluctance of many Britons to accept the decision of the 2016 independence referendum. This ongoing internal political debate has been significantly exacerbated by the EU and its members, seeking to retaliate against the UK’s hardline exit from the EU. The Inquisition would have influenced the determination of many European political leaders to punish heresy in London, largely discouraging others from even considering becoming independent. The prevailing mood in Brussels seems to be that the more unpleasant it is for Britain, the better to turn the Irish border question into a crisis.

No wonder the British voted Leave.

Donald Trump is kind of a problem within Britain now. The former US president refused—and still refuses—to accept the results of the 2020 presidential election (notably, almost no other election results, at any level, were contested across the US). Likewise, many British Remainers simply won’t admit they lost in 2016. In parliament and the courts, remainers sought to sabotage legislation implementing the Brexit referendum result and will not give up hope of another vote.

Even many Remainers who publicly said they accepted the results didn’t really feel it in their hearts. For example, he perpetuated the myth that, prior to Britain’s formal withdrawal, EU treaties and regulations prevented London from negotiating bilateral trade agreements that would come into force after full independence. could have been But that was nonsense. The British people had announced with their votes that Britain was leaving.

Accepting to be bound by terms that were unenforceable and unreasonable in the circumstances tied Britain’s hands when it could have secured dozens of bilateral trade deals. Would Brussels have behaved worse than it does now?

Likewise the British, particularly the Conservative Party No conclusion should be drawn That Truss’s tax proposals, however badly mishandled, are doomed forever. Currently, little is understood about what the Truss government did or did not do in its rollout strategy, but anything that emerges later will only detail the strategy and mechanics. How bad politics derailed good policies. This will say nothing about the merits of the plans themselves, except for the interest the US and European establishment have in keeping taxes high and interest rates low. Maybe they really do Fear of economic development. The moral is to remember the courage shown by Margaret Thatcher (“a woman is not for bending”) and Ronald Reagan in the days of tax cuts.

We will soon know who the UK’s next Prime Minister is and how he plans to proceed. For all the dire warnings about the imminent d*mise of the Conservative Party, remember who their opposition is: the Labor Party. This should boost their morale.

“Land of hope and glory. . . God who made you strong, make you stronger!”

pl_facebook_pixel_args = [];
pl_facebook_pixel_args.userAgent = navigator.userAgent;
pl_facebook_pixel_args.language = navigator.language;

if ( document.referrer.indexOf( document.domain ) < 0 ) {
pl_facebook_pixel_args.referrer = document.referrer;
}

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');

fbq( 'consent', 'revoke' );
fbq( 'init', "394368290733607" );
fbq( 'track', 'PageView', pl_facebook_pixel_args );

if ( typeof window.__tcfapi !== 'undefined' ) {
window.__tcfapi( 'addEventListener', 2, function( tcData, listenerSuccess ) {
if ( listenerSuccess ) {
if ( tcData.eventStatus === 'useractioncomplete' || tcData.eventStatus === 'tcloaded' ) {

__tcfapi( 'getCustomVendorConsents', 2, function( vendorConsents, success ) {
if ( ! vendorConsents.hasOwnProperty( 'consentedPurposes' ) ) {
return;
}

const consents = vendorConsents.consentedPurposes.filter(
function( vendorConsents ) {
return 'Create a personalised ads profile' === vendorConsents.name;
}
);

if ( consents.length === 1 ) {
fbq( 'consent', 'grant' );
}
} );
}
}
});
}

#Brits #voted #Leave #OlxPraca

Source link